Friday, April 29, 2011

Three AP essay questions.

Dear students: allow yourself no more than 60 minutes for the multiple choice exam. Then, if you have the stamina, try either two of the following questions in an 80 minute span, or all three in a 120 minute span. Use ink for your essays, because that's required for the actual exam.
J.D.

Question 1

(Suggested time—40 minutes. This question counts as one-third of the total essay section score.)

The following two poems present animal-eye views of the world. Read each poem carefully. Then write an essay in

which you analyze the techniques used in the poems to characterize the speakers and convey differing views of the

world.


HAWK ROOSTING


I sit in the top of the wood, my eyes closed.

Inaction, no falsifying dream

Between my hooked head and hooked feet:

Or in sleep rehearse perfect kills and eat.


5 The convenience of the high trees!

The air’s buoyancy and the sun’s ray

Are of advantage to me;

And the earth’s face upward for my inspection.


My feet are locked upon the rough bark.

10 It took the whole of Creation

To produce my foot, my each feather:

Now I hold Creation in my foot


Or fly up, and revolve it all slowly—

I kill where I please because it is all mine.

15 There is no sophistry in my body:

My manners are tearing off heads—


The allotment of death.

For the one path of my flight is direct

Through the bones of the living.

20 No arguments assert my right:


The sun is behind me.

Nothing has changed since I began.

My eye has permitted no change.

I am going to keep things like this.


—Ted Hughes

From Lupercal, by Ted Hughes.

Faber & Faber Ltd., 1960.



GOLDEN RETRIEVALS


Fetch? Balls and sticks capture my attention

seconds at a time. Catch? I don’t think so.

Bunny, tumbling leaf, a squirrel who’s—oh

joy—actually scared. Sniff the wind, then


5 I’m off again: muck, pond, ditch, residue

of any thrillingly dead thing. And you?

Either you’re sunk in the past, half our walk,

thinking of what you never can bring back,


or else you’re off in some fog concerning

10 —tomorrow, is that what you call it? My work:

to unsnare time’s warp (and woof!), retrieving,

my haze-headed friend, you. This shining bark,


a Zen master’s bronzy gong, calls you here,

entirely, now: bow-wow, bow-wow, bow-wow.


—Mark Doty

Copyright © 1998 by Mark Doty.

Reprinted by permission of HarperCollins Publishers, Inc.



Question 2

(Suggested time — 40 minutes. This question counts as one-third of the total essay section score.)

Jane Austen’s novel Northanger Abbey (1818) opens with the following passage. Read the passage carefully.

Then, in a well-organized essay, analyze the literary techniques Austen uses to characterize Catherine Morland.


No one who had ever seen Catherine Morland

in her infancy would have supposed her born to be

an heroine. Her situation in life, the character of her

father and mother, her own person and disposition,

5 were all equally against her. Her father was a

clergyman, without being neglected or poor, and

a very respectable man, though his name was

Richard, and he had never been handsome. He

had a considerable independence besides two good

10 livings,1 and he was not in the least addicted to

locking up his daughters. Her mother was a woman

of useful plain sense, with a good temper, and, what

is more remarkable, with a good constitution. She had

three sons before Catherine was born; and, instead

15 of dying in bringing the latter into the world, as

anybody might expect, she still lived on—lived to

have six children more—to see them growing up

around her, and to enjoy excellent health herself.

A family of ten children will be always called a fine

20 family, where there are heads, and arms, and legs

enough for the number; but the Morlands had little

other right to the word, for they were in general very

plain, and Catherine, for many years of her life,

as plain as any. She had a thin awkward figure,

25 a sallow skin without colour, dark lank hair, and

strong features; so much for her person, and not less

unpropitious for heroism seemed her mind. She was

fond of all boys’ play and greatly preferred cricket,

not merely to dolls, but to the more heroic enjoyments

30 of infancy, nursing a dormouse, feeding a canary-bird,

or watering a rose-bush. Indeed she had no taste for

a garden, and if she gathered flowers at all, it was

chiefly for the pleasure of mischief, at least so it was

conjectured from her always preferring those which

35 she was forbidden to take. Such were her propensities;

her abilities were quite as extraordinary. She never

could learn or understand anything before she was

taught, and sometimes not even then, for she was

often inattentive, and occasionally stupid. Her mother

40 was three months in teaching her only to repeat the

“Beggar’s Petition,” and, after all, her next sister Sally

could say it better than she did. Not that Catherine

was always stupid; by no means; she learnt the fable

of “The Hare and many Friends,” as quickly as any

45 girl in England. Her mother wished her to learn

music; and Catherine was sure she should like it,

for she was very fond of tinkling the keys of the old

forlorn spinnet,2 so at eight years old she began. She

learnt a year and could not bear it; and Mrs. Morland,

50 who did not insist on her daughters being accomplished

in spite of incapacity or distaste, allowed her

to leave off. The day which dismissed the musicmaster

was one of the happiest of Catherine’s life.

Her taste for drawing was not superior; though

55 whenever she could obtain the outside of a letter

from her mother, or seize upon any other odd piece

of paper, she did what she could in that way by

drawing houses and trees, hens and chickens, all

very much like one another. Writing and accounts

60 she was taught by her father; French by her mother.

Her proficiency in either was not remarkable, and she

shirked her lessons in both whenever she could. What

a strange unaccountable character! for with all these

symptoms of profligacy at ten years old, she had

65 neither a bad heart nor a bad temper, was seldom

stubborn, scarcely ever quarrelsome, and very kind

to the little ones, with few interruptions of tyranny.

She was, moreover, noisy and wild, hated confinement

and cleanliness, and loved nothing so well in

70 the world as rolling down the green slope at the back

of the house.

1 Incomes or endowments

2 Piano



Question 3

(Suggested time—40 minutes. This question counts as one-third of the total essay section score.)

In some works of literature, childhood and adolescence are portrayed as times graced by innocence and a sense

of wonder; in other works, they are depicted as times of tribulation and terror. Focusing on a single novel or play,

explain how its representation of childhood or adolescence shapes the meaning of the work as a whole.

You may select a work from the list below or choose another appropriate novel or play of similar literary merit.

Avoid mere plot summary.


The Adventures of Huckleberry Finn

Black Boy

Bless Me, Ultima

The Bluest Eye

The Catcher in the Rye

Cat’s Eye

The Chosen

Great Expectations

A High Wind in Jamaica

The House on Mango Street

Jane Eyre

Kafka on the Shore

Little Women

Lord of the Flies

“Master Harold” . . . and the boys

The Member of the Wedding

My Ántonia

Native Speaker

Old School

Pocho

A Portrait of the Artist As a Young Man

The Prime of Miss Jean Brodie

The Red Badge of Courage

A River Runs Through It

Romeo and Juliet

Sula

To Kill a Mockingbird

To the Lighthouse

Tom Jones

The Turn of the Screw

Wide Sargasso Sea

Woman Warrior

Wuthering Heights

No comments:

Post a Comment