Monday, May 23, 2011

Since you mentioned Mr. Kurtz…

In Heart of Darkness, Marlow’s descriptions of Kurtz include the following: “a wandering and tormented thing”, someone whose words were like “phrases spoken in nightmares”, someone who “had no restraint, no faith”, whose “soul was mad”, someone who “struggled, struggled”.

Think back to the nightmare-like atmosphere that suffused Heart of Darkness, then read again the description of Rodya’s last dream (6 pages from the end of the novel, p. 547 P/V version, paragraph beginning “He lay in the hospital all through the end of Lent…” up through “…had heard their words or voices.”

Both Raskolnikov and Kurtz engage in interior battles between their better nature and their desire to “step over”, to be “supermen”. Crime and Punishment, however, ends with a powerful sense of hope and redemption, whereas Heart of Darkness ends with (naturally)…darkness.

How can we better understand Raskolnikov’s redemption through the tragedy of Kurtz? (As always, support your opinions.)

And this is it…our last blog entry of 2010-2011. See you Wednesday.

Sunday, May 22, 2011

Final Discussion topics for Monday

These are the passages & issues we'll address tomorrow during class. YOU MUST have your text with you. If you don't, you will receive no credit for participation in the discuss. And of course YOU MUST participate if you wish participation credit.

For Thursday's class, bring your complete notes from C&P discussions ready to turn in. Our entire class time will be turned over to parody composition and rehearsal.

Suffering, sacrifice and redemption and the Christian symbolism of the novel

A. Early on references to Christ appear in the novel. One of the earliest is in Pulcheria’s letter to Rodya telling him about Dunya. After he reads the letter we get a window into his thoughts: p. 40, Part I, Ch. 4 “It’s hard to ascend Golgotha” and p. 41 “Can it be that she’s secretly tormented by remorse at having agreed to sacrifice her daughter for the sake of her son.”

B. When Rodya first goes to Sonya’s he asks her to read the story of Lazarus—why? p. 326-329, Part IV, Ch. 4. (She must believe in the next life—her only hope; he needs to believe in resurrection in THIS life.)

C. Both Sonya and Lizaveta assume the form of complete innocents who sacrifice and suffer for others and at the moment that Rodya tells Sonya of the murders, she even appears as Lizaveta—p. 410-411 Part five, Ch. 4: “Again, as soon as he said this, a former, familiar sensation suddenly turned his soul to ice…the same childlike smile.” (suffer the little children?)

D. P.420-421 pivotal discussion beginning with “Was it the old crone I killed? Through “your whole life” Part five, Ch. 4 two pages from the end.

The symbolism of crosses and the crossroads and the need to suffer until he learns to connect to his fellow man and love are underscored even more in the confession scene, p. 522-525 Part six, Ch. 8.

E. Note Raskolnikov has sinned not so much against God as against humanity and the earth—and so his redemption must be achieved with people, on earth.

F. Water and air also have symbolic significance:

p. 114-115 Part two, Ch. 2 - loses his right to beauty & clean air

Throughout he can’t breathe—note Porfiry keeps coming back to his need for air and to embrace suffering p. 460-461 Part six, Ch. 2

Svidrigailov hates water—“never in my life have I liked water…landscapes” p.504

G. Note his suffering in prison is of a different sort—he still has not accepted love and connection and cannot be redeemed and freed from suffering until he does.

· p. 544: “This alone he recognized as his crime ... new vision of life.”

· p. 545: “But, generally, he came to be surprised…different nations”

· p. 546: “As for him, he was disliked and avoided by everyone.”

· p. 546: “Still another question…Little mother”

H. Discuss the suddenness of his “conversion”—like a flash of light. P. 549

“He was risen and he knew it…“ p.550

Sunday, May 15, 2011

Blood & Water—post group result here

Without getting too intellectually pretentious (save that for future dorm lounge discussions) we'll have a try at deciphering Dostoevsky's use of these two elements in the scheme of symbolism he developed for Crime & Punishment. I'll look over what you report, and get some ideas we can explore in our final week with Russian Lit. After that, its back to good old Will Shakespeare.
Colin: you'll like Macbeth. He dithers a bit, but plunges the knife early in Act II. By Shakespeare's standards, this also is a short five-acter.
J.D.

Apologies for the late post—from me & Svidri

Dear class: I'm sorry I forgot to put up the post right away. I hope it's just a matter of entering your results, because I'd still like to have a round table discussion based on what you discovered. You can place your own thoughts on Svidrigailov here, and the committee reports on the next post up.

Friday, April 29, 2011

Three AP essay questions.

Dear students: allow yourself no more than 60 minutes for the multiple choice exam. Then, if you have the stamina, try either two of the following questions in an 80 minute span, or all three in a 120 minute span. Use ink for your essays, because that's required for the actual exam.
J.D.

Question 1

(Suggested time—40 minutes. This question counts as one-third of the total essay section score.)

The following two poems present animal-eye views of the world. Read each poem carefully. Then write an essay in

which you analyze the techniques used in the poems to characterize the speakers and convey differing views of the

world.


HAWK ROOSTING


I sit in the top of the wood, my eyes closed.

Inaction, no falsifying dream

Between my hooked head and hooked feet:

Or in sleep rehearse perfect kills and eat.


5 The convenience of the high trees!

The air’s buoyancy and the sun’s ray

Are of advantage to me;

And the earth’s face upward for my inspection.


My feet are locked upon the rough bark.

10 It took the whole of Creation

To produce my foot, my each feather:

Now I hold Creation in my foot


Or fly up, and revolve it all slowly—

I kill where I please because it is all mine.

15 There is no sophistry in my body:

My manners are tearing off heads—


The allotment of death.

For the one path of my flight is direct

Through the bones of the living.

20 No arguments assert my right:


The sun is behind me.

Nothing has changed since I began.

My eye has permitted no change.

I am going to keep things like this.


—Ted Hughes

From Lupercal, by Ted Hughes.

Faber & Faber Ltd., 1960.



GOLDEN RETRIEVALS


Fetch? Balls and sticks capture my attention

seconds at a time. Catch? I don’t think so.

Bunny, tumbling leaf, a squirrel who’s—oh

joy—actually scared. Sniff the wind, then


5 I’m off again: muck, pond, ditch, residue

of any thrillingly dead thing. And you?

Either you’re sunk in the past, half our walk,

thinking of what you never can bring back,


or else you’re off in some fog concerning

10 —tomorrow, is that what you call it? My work:

to unsnare time’s warp (and woof!), retrieving,

my haze-headed friend, you. This shining bark,


a Zen master’s bronzy gong, calls you here,

entirely, now: bow-wow, bow-wow, bow-wow.


—Mark Doty

Copyright © 1998 by Mark Doty.

Reprinted by permission of HarperCollins Publishers, Inc.



Question 2

(Suggested time — 40 minutes. This question counts as one-third of the total essay section score.)

Jane Austen’s novel Northanger Abbey (1818) opens with the following passage. Read the passage carefully.

Then, in a well-organized essay, analyze the literary techniques Austen uses to characterize Catherine Morland.


No one who had ever seen Catherine Morland

in her infancy would have supposed her born to be

an heroine. Her situation in life, the character of her

father and mother, her own person and disposition,

5 were all equally against her. Her father was a

clergyman, without being neglected or poor, and

a very respectable man, though his name was

Richard, and he had never been handsome. He

had a considerable independence besides two good

10 livings,1 and he was not in the least addicted to

locking up his daughters. Her mother was a woman

of useful plain sense, with a good temper, and, what

is more remarkable, with a good constitution. She had

three sons before Catherine was born; and, instead

15 of dying in bringing the latter into the world, as

anybody might expect, she still lived on—lived to

have six children more—to see them growing up

around her, and to enjoy excellent health herself.

A family of ten children will be always called a fine

20 family, where there are heads, and arms, and legs

enough for the number; but the Morlands had little

other right to the word, for they were in general very

plain, and Catherine, for many years of her life,

as plain as any. She had a thin awkward figure,

25 a sallow skin without colour, dark lank hair, and

strong features; so much for her person, and not less

unpropitious for heroism seemed her mind. She was

fond of all boys’ play and greatly preferred cricket,

not merely to dolls, but to the more heroic enjoyments

30 of infancy, nursing a dormouse, feeding a canary-bird,

or watering a rose-bush. Indeed she had no taste for

a garden, and if she gathered flowers at all, it was

chiefly for the pleasure of mischief, at least so it was

conjectured from her always preferring those which

35 she was forbidden to take. Such were her propensities;

her abilities were quite as extraordinary. She never

could learn or understand anything before she was

taught, and sometimes not even then, for she was

often inattentive, and occasionally stupid. Her mother

40 was three months in teaching her only to repeat the

“Beggar’s Petition,” and, after all, her next sister Sally

could say it better than she did. Not that Catherine

was always stupid; by no means; she learnt the fable

of “The Hare and many Friends,” as quickly as any

45 girl in England. Her mother wished her to learn

music; and Catherine was sure she should like it,

for she was very fond of tinkling the keys of the old

forlorn spinnet,2 so at eight years old she began. She

learnt a year and could not bear it; and Mrs. Morland,

50 who did not insist on her daughters being accomplished

in spite of incapacity or distaste, allowed her

to leave off. The day which dismissed the musicmaster

was one of the happiest of Catherine’s life.

Her taste for drawing was not superior; though

55 whenever she could obtain the outside of a letter

from her mother, or seize upon any other odd piece

of paper, she did what she could in that way by

drawing houses and trees, hens and chickens, all

very much like one another. Writing and accounts

60 she was taught by her father; French by her mother.

Her proficiency in either was not remarkable, and she

shirked her lessons in both whenever she could. What

a strange unaccountable character! for with all these

symptoms of profligacy at ten years old, she had

65 neither a bad heart nor a bad temper, was seldom

stubborn, scarcely ever quarrelsome, and very kind

to the little ones, with few interruptions of tyranny.

She was, moreover, noisy and wild, hated confinement

and cleanliness, and loved nothing so well in

70 the world as rolling down the green slope at the back

of the house.

1 Incomes or endowments

2 Piano



Question 3

(Suggested time—40 minutes. This question counts as one-third of the total essay section score.)

In some works of literature, childhood and adolescence are portrayed as times graced by innocence and a sense

of wonder; in other works, they are depicted as times of tribulation and terror. Focusing on a single novel or play,

explain how its representation of childhood or adolescence shapes the meaning of the work as a whole.

You may select a work from the list below or choose another appropriate novel or play of similar literary merit.

Avoid mere plot summary.


The Adventures of Huckleberry Finn

Black Boy

Bless Me, Ultima

The Bluest Eye

The Catcher in the Rye

Cat’s Eye

The Chosen

Great Expectations

A High Wind in Jamaica

The House on Mango Street

Jane Eyre

Kafka on the Shore

Little Women

Lord of the Flies

“Master Harold” . . . and the boys

The Member of the Wedding

My Ántonia

Native Speaker

Old School

Pocho

A Portrait of the Artist As a Young Man

The Prime of Miss Jean Brodie

The Red Badge of Courage

A River Runs Through It

Romeo and Juliet

Sula

To Kill a Mockingbird

To the Lighthouse

Tom Jones

The Turn of the Screw

Wide Sargasso Sea

Woman Warrior

Wuthering Heights

Post group reports here

Below are the instructions I gave the class this morning. Post your group findings here and we'll discuss them more fully next week (though we may be short some people due to AP exams).
Hope you got the 2004 multiple choice exam. To give you the full experience, I'm going to post three essay questions from a recent exam just after I publish this one.

Dostoevsky was aware of two structural elements that could shape his narrative

· fabula: the time sequence of action

· siuzhet: the artistic manipulation of the narrative

So Raskolnikov’s encounter with the pawnbroker, with Marmeladov, with the young girl on the street—the letter from his mother—the dream—the mention of Razumikhin—the daydream of an oasis—all have significance.

Today, in groups:

· Finish what we started with Raskolnikov. Gather and note evidence that serves to answer the question: “Who best represents the true Raskolnikov—the cynical one who rues his acts of kindness and care, the brutal Mikolka who beats the horse, the innocent child who kisses the beaten horse?”

· Examine Marmeladov and his “confession.” Develop a comprehensive catalog of the man’s character. Is he good or bad? Why and how does he fail? Why the elaborate speech and the details of his degradation? He seems to enjoy some aspects of it (note his prediction that Katerina will drag him by his hair: his anticipation of it and his reaction when it does happen). Does he wish to “crucify” himself? Looking ahead to his death, is there anything significant by way of siuzhet

· Examine Pulcheria’s letter to her son. What do we learn of her character and her relations with her son by its wording and expression? What is her real assessment of Luzhin, and by what means does she convey it? Rodion engages in a rambling soliloquy that expresses his ultimate reaction and policy. What are they?

· Why does he determine to visit Razumikhin only after “that” is finished?

· Why the nasty smile when he finishes the letter? How does his encounter with his sister and mother upon their first meeting in St. Petersburg echo his tears and his smirk?

· What is the significance of the “waking dream” of the oasis that precedes his feverish preparations for murder. He winds up late for the murder that, in part because of the overheard conversation, he believes is predestined. Why is he late? What does this “dream” signify.

Sunday, April 24, 2011

A dream, a sleep & a bedroom


You'll recall we re-read the first two paragraphs of Part I, Ch. 3 describing Raskolnikov's "closet" or garret apartment, and also the section of I, 5 detailing his dream when he falls asleep on the grass of Vasilievsky Island.
I asked you to think like a psychologist. What state of mind is likely to arise from isolation in so wretched an environment as Rodya's closet? What multi-syllable word does the narrator attach to our protagonist? Why? what does it mean?
How would you interpret & diagnose Rodya's dream? Be comprehensive—consider the extreme amount of detail, the characterization of the horse and the driver (not to mention the driver's name), the role that the boy Rodya plays…
Now consider both passages from the standpoint of a sophisticated reader. Why did the writer Dostoevsky place them where he did? This is a psychological novel, among other things. What could Rodya's room symbolize? If the horse can be identified with Lizaveta, what does that dual identity signify for our protagonist, and where does it point for his ultimate awakening?